Top 7 Alternatives to JSTOR for Research and Academic Resources

JSTOR

vs.

Elsevier

17

JSTOR and Elsevier are both digital libraries that provide access to academic journals, books, and other scholarly content. JSTOR focuses primarily on providing access to archived copies of journal articles, while Elsevier offers a wider range of content that includes books and educational resources. Both sites offer searchable databases with advanced filtering options, allowing users to easily find relevant content. However, JSTOR’s search capabilities are more specialized, as it focuses exclusively on finding scholarly literature. Elsevier also has a wider selection of content types than JSTOR and allows users to refine their searches by subject area or publication date. Additionally, Elsevier allows for user-created collections which can be used for organizing and sharing materials with others. In terms of usability, both sites have responsive designs but JSTOR's interface is simpler and easier to navigate for the average user.

JSTOR

vs.

Google Scholar

28

JSTOR and Google Scholar are both search engines for academic research material. JSTOR offers a vast library of over 12 million full-text articles, book chapters, and primary sources from 2,000+ journals and other content sources. It also provides advanced browsing and search capabilities to locate relevant content quickly. Additionally, JSTOR offers users the ability to save searches, view detailed citation information for each article and reference, sort results by relevance or date published, filter results by language or journal type/topic, and create personalized collections of content. Google Scholar is a search engine that specializes in searching scholarly literature such as peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts, and technical reports from various disciplines including medicine, biology, physics, engineering and social sciences. It works similarly to regular web searches with its own unique ranking algorithm that considers authorship of the source material among other factors. Unlike JSTOR however which includes access to its entire library of full-text articles and content sources with one subscription fee; Google Scholar does not provide access to any full-text items but instead provides links to where they can be found online. It also contains no sorting or filtering options like JSTOR does as it only provides basic keyword search functionality without much control over how results are organized or what types of content appear in the results list.

JSTOR

vs.

Web of Science

76

JSTOR and Web of Science are two websites which offer access to a range of academic resources. JSTOR offers an extensive digital library of more than 12 million articles, books, and primary sources from over 2,000 journals and other content providers. It also includes tools for searching and organizing research, as well as tools for creating citation lists and bibliographies. Web of Science provides access to over 20,000 scholarly journals, books, and conference proceedings from around the world. It also has powerful search capabilities that allow users to quickly locate relevant information on topics related to their research. Additionally, Web of Science has advanced features that enable users to track trends in certain areas of scholarship or view the impact of specific authors or institutions in terms of citations. Both websites provide access to a wide variety of content sources but with different features that cater differently to each user's needs.

JSTOR

vs.

PubMed

15

JSTOR and PubMed are both online databases that provide access to scholarly literature, but they have different focuses and features. JSTOR is a digital library of full-text contents from academic journals and primary sources, while PubMed is a search engine for medical research articles and other biomedical information. JSTOR offers access to over 6,000 journals, as well as books, images, audio clips and archival material across a variety of disciplines. It also allows users to search by keyword or browse through its collections. In contrast, PubMed focuses on providing access to medical literature from the National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. It allows searching by author name or topic, as well as filtering results based on criteria such as date range or language. Additionally, it provides links to related resources such as clinical trials and gene sequences. Both websites are valuable resources for scholars looking for in-depth information related to their research topics.

JSTOR

vs.

Scopus

83

JSTOR and Scopus are both databases that can be used for research purposes. Both provide access to full-text journal articles, but JSTOR is limited to academic journals only, while Scopus covers a wider range of publications including conference papers, book chapters and newspapers. JSTOR offers more depth in terms of its content selection, focusing on the areas of humanities, social sciences and physical sciences. Meanwhile, Scopus provides an expansive coverage of journal articles across all disciplines. In terms of search options, both databases offer advanced features such as full-text searches and citation tracking. However, JSTOR has a more sophisticated search engine with additional filters such as language, discipline and publication type. Additionally, JSTOR includes access to specialized collections such as Early American Newspapers and The Making of Modern Law. Scopus does not have any specialized collections. Both databases also include tools for managing citations and creating bibliographies using various citation styles. For visualizing data trends or connections between topics or authors, JSTOR provides Citation Maps which offer interactive visuals that compare multiple sources at once. Scopus does not include any similar tools for visualizing information.

JSTOR

vs.

ScienceDirect

18

JSTOR and ScienceDirect are both subscription-based websites providing access to scholarly journals, books and other publications. JSTOR offers a range of full-text content from more than 2,000 academic journals and over 1 million ebooks. It also features various tools to help researchers find materials, such as advanced search capabilities, citation tools and keyword navigation. ScienceDirect offers access to more than 13 million articles from over 2,500 peer-reviewed journals and over 11,000 books. It also includes a range of search options including basic and advanced searches, as well as subject browsing. Both platforms provide an array of content formats, including PDFs, audio files, videos and online exhibits. Finally, both platforms feature intuitive user interfaces that make finding relevant information easy.