7 Alternatives to Common for Affordable Co-Living Spaces

Common

vs.

College Board

15

Common and College Board are two websites that offer resources to help students navigate the college admissions process. Common is a website that offers profile building features and personalized guidance from admissions counselors with access to over 1,500 colleges and universities worldwide. Through the Common App, students can find information about their chosen school’s requirements for admission, as well as important deadlines and forms. Additionally, Common provides essay-writing tips, career exploration tools, scholarship searches, and more. College Board is a website dedicated to providing students with comprehensive college planning resources. The platform includes helpful information about college applications and admissions criteria, as well as SAT practice tests and subject guides. College Board also hosts a wide variety of online courses designed to help students prepare for post-secondary education. Both sites provide various tools that can be used to help students find the right college or university for them.

Common

vs.

All

86

Common and All are both websites that offer a range of services, but their focus is different. Common is a community-driven platform that allows users to rent out their own private space, while All is an online marketplace that offers short-term rentals. On Common, users can find shared spaces like bedrooms and houses in various cities around the world. All’s listings feature entire homes and apartments that travelers can book for short stays. Both platforms provide users with the ability to search for places by location, price range, and amenities. Additionally, both sites give customers access to ratings and reviews from past guests. However, Common also provides curated experiences in each city it serves, allowing guests to explore local activities offered through its partners. All offers more traditional rental options such as car rentals and hotel rooms, which may be more attractive for travelers who are looking for convenience over personalized experiences.

Common

vs.

Axios

101

Common and Axios are two news websites that cater to different audiences. Common is a free, independent platform that asks questions about current events and provides a space for people to discuss the answers. It uses an algorithm to match people with similar interests and encourages conversation among them. Axios is a subscription-based news site that offers up-to-date coverage on business, politics, technology, science, health care and more. Axios also offers exclusive content such as interviews, insights and analysis from journalists in the field. Common focuses on user engagement while Axios focuses on providing reliable information from experts. Both sites have mobile applications for easy access on the go.

Common

vs.

Pine

11

Common and Pine are two popular online event registration websites that offer a range of features to help streamline the event registration process. Common offers a variety of options for event customization, including customizable templates, logo and photo uploads, text and font styling, and more. Additionally, Common has an integrated ticketing system that allows users to easily create tickets and manage sales. It also offers advanced tools such as automated email notifications and integrations with payment gateways. Pine offers many of the same features as Common but takes a more “hands-off” approach to event organization. Its drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to quickly create events without having to worry about customizing each page. Pine also offers a ticketing system, but it is more limited than that of Common’s; it does not include automated email notifications or payment gateway integration. Furthermore, Pine does not provide any customization options for templates or logos. Ultimately, both Common and Pine offer great solutions for online event registration – which one works best depends on your needs and budget.

Common

vs.

Planbook

58

Common and Planbook are both online platforms that allow educators to better manage their classrooms. Common provides a suite of solutions for managing instruction and student engagement, while Planbook offers tools for organizing lesson plans, creating assessments, and tracking student progress. Common includes a range of features such as interactive lesson planning, real-time student performance reports, and automated grading systems. It also allows teachers to set up private learning communities for their students and provides various multimedia tools for teaching and collaboration. Planbook focuses primarily on the creation, organization, and management of lesson plans. Teachers can easily create, edit, share, and collaborate on lesson plans through the platform. Planbook also provides resources to help teachers create assessment items that align with their curriculum goals. Additionally, it has an integrated grade book feature which allows teachers to track student progress in real-time. Overall, both Common and Planbook offer comprehensive solutions for classroom management but each has features tailored to different needs. Common is ideal for teachers looking to engage students in dynamic lessons with multimedia content while Planbook is better suited for those who are looking for efficient ways to plan lessons and track student performance.

Common

vs.

Curology

16

Common and Curology are two websites that offer services aimed at helping people improve their skin health. Common helps its customers select the best skincare products for their needs through an online quiz. Customers can then purchase the recommended items from the online store or from a local retailer. Curology is a subscription-based service that provides custom skincare treatments tailored to each customer's unique skin type and concerns. Customers receive personalized medications that are crafted by a licensed provider and delivered directly to their door each month. Both services provide access to experienced skincare experts, but they differ in how they deliver those services - Common through an online quiz and product recommendations, while Curology offers customized treatment plans created by licensed providers.

Common

vs.

CVE

33

Common and CVE are two websites that provide businesses with a secure, cloud-based platform for managing their warranty and service contracts. Both sites offer features to help manage customers’ warranties and service contracts, such as tracking expiration dates, uploading documents, setting up notifications, tracking payments and more. Common provides an easy-to-use interface which makes it straightforward to add, edit or delete warranty and service contracts. It also allows users to export data in various formats, as well as store customer records on the platform for easy retrieval. Additionally, Common offers integrations with other services such as Salesforce and QuickBooks. CVE provides a comprehensive solution for contract management by allowing users to track all contracts in one place. It enables users to upload documents associated with each contract, set up notifications so they know when a contract is expiring or needs renewal and view payment history on the platform. Additionally, CVE offers customizations of its interface which can be used to tailor the experience to match specific user requirements. Both Common and CVE provide businesses with secure platforms for managing warranty and service contracts effectively. Common is an intuitive platform offering integrations with third-party services while CVE provides comprehensive tools with customizable options tailored to specific user needs.

Common

vs.

Glossier

22

Common and Glossier are two online beauty retailers that offer a variety of products. Common specializes in skin care, hair, and body products while Glossier focuses on makeup. Both websites provide customers with helpful product reviews and detailed descriptions to help them make an informed decision when shopping. Additionally, both websites offer free shipping for orders over a certain amount. However, Common offers free returns whereas Glossier does not. In terms of personalization, Common allows customers to customize their own skin care routine by selecting up to five different items from the website that best meet their needs. On the other hand, Glossier has a rewards program which gives customers points for every purchase and exclusive access to new products and discounts. Ultimately, both websites provide customers with great services for finding the perfect beauty products for their individual needs.

Common

vs.

Hot

22

Common and Hot are two ecommerce websites that offer an array of apparel, accessories, and lifestyle products. Common offers a curated selection of brands from around the world, with an emphasis on sustainability and ethical production. It also has a range of unique collaborations and its own in-house collections. Hot focuses on streetwear trends and provides access to limited edition products from iconic brands like Gucci, Burberry, and Air Jordan. Unlike Common, Hot specializes in collaborations between popular hip hop artists and luxury labels. Both websites feature easy returns and exchanges as well as extensive customer service options. While Common offers free shipping over $200, Hot provides free shipping on orders over $150.

Common

vs.

Java

39

Common and Java are both websites that provide web hosting services. Common offers a variety of different hosting plans, with the option to customize each plan to suit specific needs. It also provides additional features such as automatic backups, staging environments, and free SSL certificates. Java, on the other hand, specializes in providing shared and cloud hosting solutions as well as VPS and dedicated servers. Additionally, it offers domain registration services and has several tools for developers such as SSH access and database management tools. Both sites offer 24/7 customer support and come with a 99.9% uptime guarantee. However, Common allows users more flexibility in terms of configuration options, whereas Java offers more specialized options for developers and those who require more complex setups.

Common

vs.

MDM

74

Common and MDM are both comprehensive software solutions that provide organizations with tools to simplify their mobile device management (MDM) needs. Common is an all-in-one platform that allows organizations to manage multiple devices, enroll users, deploy applications, and secure data. MDM offers a more tailored approach to managing mobile devices, allowing customers the flexibility to choose the features they need. Common provides a cloud-based platform with self-service portal capabilities for users to access their personal profiles and settings. It also enables IT departments to set up mobile device policies across platforms, including Android and iOS. Common also has a wide range of security features such as remote lock, location tracking, and application whitelisting that can be applied easily across multiple devices. Additionally, Common's user provisioning feature helps organizations quickly onboard and offboard employees from their mobile devices. MDM offers a simpler setup process than Common but is more limited in its features. Unlike Common, it does not include an integrated self-service portal or user provisioning capabilities; instead it relies on third party applications for those features. However, MDM does provide fine-grained control over which applications are allowed to access specific data on a device as well as the ability to create custom policies for different types of users. Additionally, MDM supports the use of certificates for authentication and encryption purposes. Overall, Common provides more comprehensive device management capabilities while MDM offers greater flexibility when it comes to configuring individual user accounts and security settings. Both platforms are suitable for organizations looking for a way to manage their mobile devices effectively but may require different levels of customization depending on the needs of the organization.

Common

vs.

Penguin

12

Common and Penguin are both popular website builders that offer a variety of features to create a customized and professional website. Common offers an easy-to-use drag and drop editor, as well as pre-made templates and web apps to help you get started quickly. Penguin allows you to use HTML, CSS, and Javascript to create custom themes, while giving users access to the latest web technologies such as responsive design. Both websites have advanced design tools like image editing, animation effects, and more. Additionally, they both offer ample storage space for your website's content. However, one key difference is that Common offers built-in analytics tools so you can track your visitors' activity in real time, whereas Penguin does not include this feature.

Common

vs.

Nominal

35

Common and Nominal are both websites that provide small businesses with a range of services to help manage their finances. Both websites offer features such as invoicing, bookkeeping, and expense tracking. Common offers an intuitive user interface for creating invoices that is easy to use, along with an accounting dashboard where users can track their expenses and income in real time. Additionally, Common provides automated bill payments and allows you to sync data across multiple platforms. Nominal provides users with the ability to easily create invoices and quotes for clients. It also provides built-in project management tools for tracking tasks, deadlines, and progress on projects. Nominal also has the ability to connect to other popular accounting software such as QuickBooks and Xero. Additionally, it allows users to manage their customers, vendors, and staff all from one place. Overall, both Common and Nominal offer excellent features that make managing finances easier for small businesses.

Common

vs.

Oak

16

Common and Oak are two websites focused on providing stylish, high-quality home furniture and decor. Both offer a wide selection of furniture from modern to mid-century, as well as rugs, lighting, art, and accessories. Common offers an array of custom fabrics and finishes in addition to their existing product offerings. Oak also provides unique customization options such as fabric swatches and some pieces that can be built to order. Both sites provide free shipping on orders over a certain amount. Customers can chat with the customer service team at both sites for questions or assistance with orders. Common has a trade program that allows designers to access special discounts while Oak accepts returns within 14 days of delivery.

Common

vs.

Delta Air Lines

21

Common and Delta Air Lines are two different companies that provide services in the travel industry. Common is a platform for booking furnished homes and flatshares, while Delta Air Lines is one of the largest global airlines. Common offers safe and reliable housing solutions for travelers across the world, with an extensive selection of short-term rentals. Users can search for listings based on location, amenities, size and other criteria to find their ideal rental. The platform also features specialized services like professional cleaning, background-checked hosts and contactless check-ins. Delta Air Lines offers flights to more than 300 destinations worldwide. Customers can book flights by searching based on origin, destination and dates of travel as well as filter their search by specific flight times or number of stops. Additionally, customers have access to special deals on vacation packages, hotel stays and car rentals via their website. They also offer loyalty programs where customers can earn rewards points when they fly or shop. Overall, Common provides a secure home away from home while Delta Air Lines offers convenient transportation options with competitive prices and rewards programs.

Common

vs.

Lion

74

Common and Lion are both modern coworking spaces that offer a range of amenities to their members. Common offers spacious workspaces, high-speed wifi, private offices, and access to networking events. Lion offers 24/7 access, printing services, kitchenettes, and dedicated desks. Both have flexible membership plans and allow for the ability to book conference rooms for meetings or events. Common provides additional amenities such as onsite laundry services, mail handling services, and in-house cleaning staff while Lion provides additional privacy with soundproof walls in certain shared workspaces. Both offer an online community of professionals working together and share resources like printers, scanners, etc., allowing members to collaborate on projects. Finally, both provide access to community managers who can help with any questions or concerns members may have.

Common

vs.

Clear

14

Common and Clear are two similar websites that offer a wide range of services related to apartment living. While Common offers a full suite of services, including furnished apartments, roommate matching, and flexible leases, Clear focuses mainly on the rental process itself. Both websites allow users to search for rental listings using criteria such as location and price range. While Common includes listings from multiple sources in its search results, Clear only searches its own inventory. Additionally, both sites feature interactive maps with pins indicating available listings in the area. Common provides a streamlined end-to-end experience for apartment seekers by offering additional services such as digital leasing and payment processing. On the other hand, Clear emphasizes quick response times thanks to its dedicated team of local professionals who assist customers throughout the entire rental process. Overall, Common and Clear have different approaches to apartment searching but both provide useful tools for finding a place to live.

Common

vs.

Power

99

Common and Power are both online, mobile-friendly services that help users manage their finances. Common is a budgeting app that allows users to track expenses, set financial goals, and monitor their spending. Power is a platform for automating investments, allowing users to create portfolios with stocks and ETFs with just a few clicks. Both services offer features tailored to individual user needs such as budgeting tools and automatic savings plans. Common offers personalized financial coaching from certified professionals as well as the ability to sync bank accounts for real-time data tracking. Power offers tax-loss harvesting capabilities, giving users the ability to reduce capital gains taxes by adjusting portfolio allocations. Both services provide access to customer support teams with knowledgeable staff ready to answer any questions or concerns.

Common

vs.

Public

18

Common and Public are both websites that provide tools to help with the management of rental properties. Common offers a suite of services for individuals and companies looking to rent out a property, including an online platform for finding tenants, rental applications, digital lease agreements, and tenant background checks. Public offers similar services but caters more towards landlords looking to automate their rental process by providing an end-to-end platform for managing multiple properties. Both websites also provide additional features such as automated monthly payments and maintenance requests tracking. Public is more focused on providing detailed analytics about rental performance, while Common offers more personalized customer service in addition to its online tools.

Common

vs.

RSA

62

Common and RSA are two websites that offer digital security services. Common specializes in cloud-based encryption, providing users with the tools to protect their data from unauthorized access. It features an intuitive user interface, a range of encryption algorithms and customer support services. RSA, on the other hand, provides end-to-end security solutions for enterprises and businesses, including identity access management (IAM), data protection, secure remote access and more. It also offers custom consulting services with its team of security experts. Both sites provide users with a variety of tools to ensure their data is safe and secure without compromising accessibility or usability.